Towards a complete population balance model
for fluidized bed spray granulation:
Simultaneous drying and particle formation
M. Peglow, S. Heinrich, E. Tsotsas
Faculty of Process and Systems Engineering,
Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg
Abstract: This paper concerns the simultaneous
processes of agglomeration and drying. In order to predict
temperatures and moisture content in gas and particle phase,
heat and mass transfer mechanism and particle size enlargement
has been considered simultaneously. The presented model takes
heat and mass transfer phenomena between particle phase,
suspension gas and bypass gas into account. The disperse
phase is modelled by a three-dimensional population balance
(PBE), which can be reduced to a set of three one-dimensional
PBE. The latter are coupled with heat and mass transfer balances
of the gas phase. Furthermore some simulation and experimental
results are presented.
INTRODUCTION
The process of particle size enlargement can change properties
of granular materials significantly. By agglomeration fine
sized primary particles are transformed into free-flowing
and dustless consumer products. The fluidized bed technology
offers a possibility to combine the process of agglomeration
and drying in a single apparatus. The product to be dried
is fluidized by passing hot air through it. A rapid drying
rate is known to be the advantage of fluidized beds, since
the mixing of solids and gas is very efficient. In the literature,
many attempts have been made to describe the process of particle
formation in a fluidized bed in terms of population balances.
The population balance approach describes the temporal change
of particle property distributions (PPD). As a result, one
obtains the temporal change of the particle number distribution
with respect to selected particle properties. The latter
are named as the internal coordinates. Frequently, the particle
size or volume have been considered as the only significant
internal coordinate of the disperse phase. Thus, a one-dimensional
population balance equation (PBE) for growth, agglomeration
and breakage of particles has been applied to numerous processes
in chemical engineering such as crystallization, granulation
and agglomeration. see (Bramley et al., 1996; Ding et al.,
2006). The concept of one-dimensional PBE faces several problems
and limitations, see (Iveson, 2002). Therefore, the number
of significant internal coordinates has to be increased.
As soon as the number of internal coordinates is extended,
the mathematical and numerical effort increases rapidly.
In the framework of Adetayo et al. (1995), and Hounslow et
al. (2001), a high shear granulation in rotating drums in
terms of population balances is investigated. Hounslow et
al. (2001) extended the internal coordinates by the particle
tracer mass. The resulting two-dimensional PBE was reduced
to a set of two one-dimensional PBE assuming that particles
of the same size contain the same amount of tracer mass.
Tan et al. (2004) applied this model to fluidized bed melt
agglomeration.
For the more general case of liquid spray granulation, one-dimensional
population balance models can be found, see e.g. Saleh et
al. (2003), but studies on the simultaneous description of
agglomeration and drying in a population balance model are
missing. The impact of operating conditions on the PPD has
been investigated by various authors, see (Adetayo et al.,
1995; Watano et al., 1996; Schaafsma, 2000). Watano et al.
(1996) observed that the moisture content in solids is one
of the most important particle properties to control the
agglomeration process. This leads to the conclusion that
properties such as particle size and moisture content have
to be considered simultaneously in a population balance model.
Our study presents a novel model that is capable to eliminate
the missing link between the processes of agglomeration and
drying.
THEORY AND NUMERICAL METHODS
A two-dimensional particle property distribution is defined
as f(t,v,c), where v and c are two distinct properties, usually
the granule volume (size) and any extensive property of the
particles such as moisture of particles or enthalpy. In a first step, we want
to follow the idea of Hounslow et al. (2001). Beside the granule volume v they
considered the tracer mass c as the second internal coordinate, see (Hounslow
et al., 2001). The total number of particles N in a domain D is given by
(1)
It should be noted that the granule volume v contains volume
of tracer mass and volume of particles, that is c ≤ v.
The two-dimensional population balance equation can be obtained
by extending the classical one-dimensional PBE to two-dimensional
space as in (Hounslow et al., 2001),
(2)
Hounslow et al. (2001) reduced the two-dimensional population
balance model to a set of one-dimensional population balances
using the marginal distribution approach. The reduced population
balance for the particle number distribution n(t,v) can be
deduced as
(3)
The temporal change of tracer distribution m(t,v) is given
by
(4)
Thus, the above continuous system of equations may be applied
for the computation of temporal change of particle number
and tracer mass distribution. It is difficult to solve this
system analytically, so numerical methods have to be applied
for the solution. One way to solve such systems numerically
is to discretize the size domain into small sections and
to reduce the system into a system of ordinary differential
equations.
Hounslow et al. (1988) developed a discretized method for
population balance equation as given in equation (3). A discretization
scheme of reduced PBE (4) is suggested by Hounslow et al.
(2001). In both approaches the particle volume domain is
divided into small sections and the density is assumed to
be constant within each section. The final set of equations
preserves particle numbers and mass. However, for certain
application the discretization given in Hounslow et al. (2001)
is inconsistent with intensive properties of solid phase.
Therefore, Peglow et al. (2006) suggested a modified discretization
of Hounslow et al. (2001). The modified method which preserves
the mass and the number of the system as before and predicts
the intensive properties such as temperature of solids or
concentrations within a granule as well. The final set of
discretized equations for a grid of type
(5)
is given by
(6)
for the evolution of number distribution and
(7)
for evolution of tracer distribution. The correction factors
are given by
(8)
An extended formulation of equation (7) for an adjustable
geometric grid of type
(9)
is presented in Peglow et al. (2006). Now in the next section
we want to derive a population balance model for simultaneous
drying and aggregation. For this purpose we are going to
apply the reduced set of population balances as given in
equations (3) and (4). Furthermore a selected simulation
result will be presented.
MODELLING OF GAS AND SOLID PHASE
To describe the simultaneous agglomeration and drying process,
we use a heterogeneous fluidized bed model which incorporates
the active bypass. This model is based on the assumption,
that a certain fraction of fluidization gas passes the solid
phase as a bypass. Burgschweiger (2000) applied this model
for drying of porous materials using adsorption isotherms.
To model the heat and mass transfer processes, the following
assumptions are made
The bypass
fraction is free of solids and it is in plug flow.
All
solids are in the suspension phase. The suspension is
in plug flow. No back mixing occurs.
The
particles are ideal mixed.
Vapor
and heat transfer take place between suspension and
bypass phase.
Vapor
and heat transfer take place between surface of particles
and gas in suspension phase. Water sprayed in is
deposited on particles.
The
wall may exchange heat with environment, particles,
suspension gas and bypass gas.
In Figure 1 the balance scheme is shown. All heat, mass
and enthalpy fluxes between solid and gas phase considered
in the model are depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Balance scheme of the
fluid bed model
Modeling of solid phase
The agglomeration process for batch vessels is described
by means of the one-dimensional PBE
(10)
The parameter influencing the shape of PPD is the agglomeration
rate β defined by
(11)
Since the model describes heat and mass transfer processes,
we need the corresponding kinetic expressions. According
to Groenewold and Tsotsas (1997) the mass transfer between
the solids and the suspension gas is determined by
(12)
where Yeq denotes the
equilibrium moisture content. This property depends on the
sorption equilibrium of the solids and can be expressed in
terms of the sorption isotherm. The heat transfer between
the granules and the gas phase is given by
(13)
The kinetic expressions in equations (12) and (13) contain
two more properties of solid phase, the temperature of particles
Jp and the moisture content X. It is clear that these properties
have to be considered in the model as the combined description
of agglomeration and drying is the objective of this study.
Since the population balance for agglomeration is not capable
to predict intensive properties of solid phase (temperature
and moisture content) directly, we need to express those
properties in terms of the corresponding extensive properties.
In our case the temperature and moisture content will be
represented by the enthalpy and the mass of liquid respectively.
According to previous section, see equation (4), balances
for the enthalpy of particles
(14)
and the mass of liquid
(15)
can be formulated. To incorporate the solid and gas phase
in one model, additional terms have to be included in equations
(14) and (15), which take the heat, mass and enthalpy flux
between these two phases into account (see Figure 1). Thus
the coupling of the solid and gas phase is established.
The Gas Phase
According to Figure 1, the following mass and heat balances
for suspension and bypass gas phases can be derived. The
moisture and enthalpy in suspension gas phase are given by
(16)
(17)
Analog to that, that balances for the bypass gas phase can
be deduced
(18)
(19)
The parameter n is the ratio of gas flowing through the
bypass to total gas flow rate. This parameter depends on
Geldart classification of particles and bed height. A briefer
discussion of this model is given in Peglow (2005).
SIMULATION RESULTS
In this section a simulation example of an agglomeration
process is provided. Such a process is usually characterized
by three stages. Firstly the primary particles are dried
and heated. In a second stage the particles are wetted by
spraying in a liquid binder. At this stage the formation
of agglomerates occurs. Finally the wet agglomerates will
be dried up to a moisture content defined by product specifications.
In our simulation it will be assumed, that the particle size
distribution will change only during spraying and remains
constant in the first and last stage. The main process parameters
are summarized in Table 1. The model has been implemented
in the MATLAB suite. For the numerical integration we used
the integration routine ode15s. The ode15s is an implicit
procedure based on numerical differentiation equipped with
an automatic step size control. It is suited for stiff systems.
Figures 2, 3 and 4 reflect the transient behavior of properties
of solid phase for all three stages. Additionally Figure
5 depicts the progression of mean and outlet moisture of
gas phase. As mentioned above the first stage provides drying
and heating of particles. During this process the outlet
humidity of the gas phase decreases to the value of gas inlet
moisture. At the end of this stage the moisture content of
solids is equal to equilibrium moisture content determined
by sorption isotherm of the granules. In the second stage,
the agglomeration stage, a certain amount of liquid is sprayed
onto the solids. Thus the moisture content of solids increases
rapidly. The temperature of granules decreases due to evaporation.
Figure 4 shows that small particles are drier than larger
particles. This effect is caused by the size dependency of
heat and mass transfer coefficients. Since a size independent
kernel has been assumed for this agglomeration stage, a change
of particle size distribution can be observed. Any type of
agglomeration kernel can be chosen, but for simplicity size-independent
kernel has been assumed. The actual value of β0 can
be calculated by defining the degree of aggregation Iagg.
Here we set this value to Iagg =
0.8. Finally, the particles are dried in the last stage.
Since no liquid is sprayed onto the granules, the moisture
content decreases and the particle temperature increases
again. No change on particle size occurs, since the agglomeration
rate is set to zero. Summarizing we can conclude, that the
model is capable to predict the transient behavior of solid
phase and gas phase properties as well. In the next section
we want to turn to the experimental validation of this model.
| Table 1: Main simulation parameters |
| Bed mass |
1 |
kg |
| Density of particles |
800 |
kg/m3 |
| Heat capacity of particles |
1000 |
J/(kg K) |
| Diameter of apparatus |
0.15 |
m |
| Mass flow rate of dry gas |
0.06 |
kg/s |
| Gas inlet moisture |
0.01 |
- |
| Gas inlet temperature |
60 |
°C |
| Liquid flow rate (2nd stage) |
2.1 |
kg/h |
| Liquid temperature |
20 |
°C |
| Drying time (1st stage) |
600 |
s |
| Agglomeration time (2nd stage) |
1000 |
s |
| Drying time (3rd stage) |
600 |
s |
| Agglomeration rate |
3.418-9 |
1/s |
Figure 2: Evolution of Particle
Size Distribution
Figure 3: Progression of particle
enthalpy temperature
Figure 4: Progression of amount
of particle moisture content
Figure 5: Progression of outlet
and mean gas moisture content
EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION
The objective of the experiments was to investigate the
simultaneous agglomeration and drying. For the experiments
we used microcrystalline cellulose, also known as MCC. It
is widely used in pharmaceutical industry as a carrier material
for active agents. Pharmacoat 606 was used as a binder. Experiments
have been conducted in a commercial fluidized bed (Type GPCF
1.1) of Glatt company. The main component of this plant is
the conical fluidization chamber with a diameter of 138 mm
at the bottom and 304 mm at the top. The height of the chamber
is 565 mm. The process can be observed through two glass
slits. A blower sucks the fluidization gas into an electro
heater of 3.96 kW. The electro heater controls the inlet
temperature of the fluidization gas. The actual value is
measured by a thermo couple which is fixed below the air
distribution plate. An electrical adjustable flap placed
in front of the blower controls the air flow rate. Outlet
air is cleaned by the two tube filters which are at the top
of the apparatus. The filters are cleaned asynchronously
in fixed time intervals. For sampling during the agglomeration
process a small discharge pipe is provided. A glass valve
is connected in a gas-tight junction with the pipe. By spring
mechanism the removal is opened and the valve is filled with
granules from the bed. The binder solution is sprayed onto
the fluidized bed by the two-component nozzle (Type 970/0-S04)
of Schlick company. The throughput and the spray pattern
is controlled by the air pressure and an air flap. During
the experiments the nozzle was used in a top spray configuration.
A gradual adjustable flexible-tube pump controlled the flow
rate of binder to the nozzle. A balance was used to measure
the actual throughput.
Main process parameters are summarized in Table 2. At the
beginning of each experiment, the apparatus was shut down
to fill the fluidization chamber with hold-up material. The
bed material was dried and heated up for 4 minutes. After
the pre-drying process the binder was sprayed onto the bed
material. The spraying time was chosen in such a way that
a fixed fraction of 10 % binder of hold-up was achieved.
The samples were collected during spraying at constant time
intervals of 2 minutes. In addition to particle moisture
content, measured with Halogen Moisture Content Analyzer,
the particle size distribution of these samples was analyzed.
The CamSizer system of company Retsch Technologies, based
on digital picture processing, was used for particle size
and particle shape characterization. Finally the material
was dried for 4 minutes after the end of spaying.
| Table 2: Main experimental parameters |
| Bed mass |
0.2 |
kg |
| Mass flow rate of dry gas |
0.014 |
kg/s |
| Gas inlet moisture |
0.0085 |
g/kg |
| Gas inlet temperature |
60 |
°C |
| Liquid flow rate (2nd stage) |
0.48 |
kg/h |
| Liquid temperature |
20 |
°C |
| Drying time (1st stage) |
360 |
s |
| Agglomeration time (2nd stage) |
1200 |
s |
| Drying time (3rd stage) |
20 |
s |
| Agglomeration rate |
5.174.10-4 |
1/s |
Figure 6: Time progression of
gas outlet temperature
Figure 7: Time progression of
gas moisture at the inlet and outlet
Figure 8: Time progression of
mean particle moisture content
The experimental result and comparison with simulation are
exemplified in Figure 6 to Figure 9. The progress of gas
outlet temperature in Figure 6 shows three characteristic
stages. First of all the outlet temperature increases up
to t = 240 s. This increase characterizes the pre-drying
period (1st stage). During
this period the hold-up is been dried and heated-up. This
drying process can also be identified by time progression
of the outlet gas humidity content in Figure 8. Shortly after
starting the experiment, the outlet gas humidity increases
rapidly. After this, the humidity decreases up to the value
of gas inlet humidity. This point indicates the end of drying.
The particle moisture content remains constant. The spraying
of binder starts at t = 240 s. Here a rapid decrease of gas
outlet temperature can be observed. Simultaneously the gas
outlet humidity increases and remains constant after a short
time. At this point the total liquid hold-up of the bed material
remains nearly constant. The amount of sprayed and dried
liquid is the same. The constant value of particle moisture
content, shown in Figure 8, confirms this observation. The
gas outlet temperature decreases during the entire spraying
time. This progression is caused by the slow decrease of
wall temperature, which is in heat transfer with particles,
gas and environment. The spraying ends at t = 1560 s. The
last stage indicates the drying of agglomerates. Again, a
decrease of gas outlet humidity and an increase of gas outlet
temperature can be observed. To predict the evolution of
particle size distribution a size dependent kernel
(20)
has been applied. The fitting parameters a, b and b0 have
been determined from the measurement results using an inverse
technique. A brief introduction to this approach is given
in Peglow et al. (2006). In our case we obtained a = 0.71053,
b = 0.06211 and β0 =
5.174.10-4. A comparison of experiment and simulation PSD
is presented in Figure 9.
Figure 9: Evolution of particle
size distribution (RE – relative error)
CONCLUSION
This paper presents a new modeling approach for simultaneous
agglomeration and drying in fluidized bed. Using a heterogeneous
fluidized bed model with active bypass, all relevant heat
and mass balances have been derived. The solid phase has
been described in terms of population balances. Here three
one-dimensional PBE, for particle size, for enthalpy and
for liquid mass distribution have been applied. Since an
analytical solution of the model is not possible, a numerical
simulation has been provided. Therefore a new discrete formulation
of PBE which is capable to predict extensive and intensive
properties of the solid phase has been utilized. For the
validation of presented model, agglomeration and drying experiments
with MCC have been carried out. Preliminary investigations
have been conducted to characterize the drying and adsorption
behavior of MCC at different temperatures. The experimental
results of this investigations have been used for a validation
of the model. For batch-wise agglomeration of MCC it has
been demonstrated, that the evolution of PSD and mean moisture
content of solid phase are reproduced by the model. The agglomeration
kinetic has been determined directly from measured evolution
of PSD. Properties of gas phase such as gas outlet humidity
gas outlet temperature can be predicted without any fitting.
NOTATION
| a |
empirical parameter |
- |
| A |
surface area |
m2 |
| b |
empirical parameter |
- |
| c |
particle property |
m3 |
| d |
diameter |
m |
| I |
total number of intervals |
- |
| K |
correction factor |
- |
| f |
2-D population density function |
1/m6 |
| H |
enthalpy |
J |
| h |
enthalpy density function |
J/m3 |
| M |
mass |
kg |
| m |
mass density function |
kg/m3 |
| m |
tracer mass density function |
kg/m3 |
| n |
number density function |
1/m3 |
| N |
number of particles |
- |
| Q |
heat |
J |
| q |
parameter for grid adaptation |
- |
| t |
time |
s |
| u |
volume |
m3 |
| v |
volume |
m3 |
| X |
moisture content in solid phase |
kgw,l/kgs |
| Y |
moisture content in gas phase |
kgw,l/kgg |
| Greek Symbols |
| α |
heat transfer coefficient |
W/(m2s) |
| β |
agglomeration rate |
1/s |
| β |
mass transfer coefficient |
m/s |
| γ |
integration constant |
- |
| ε |
integration constant |
- |
|
normalized drying curve |
- |
| ν |
bypass fraction |
- |
| ξ |
bed height |
m |
| ρ |
density |
kg/m3 |
| ϑ |
temperature |
°C |
| Subscripts |
| b |
bypass phase |
|
| e |
environment |
|
| eq |
equilibrium |
|
| g |
gas phase |
|
| i |
interval, Index |
|
| j |
interval, Index |
|
| l |
liquid |
|
| n |
nozzle |
|
| p |
particle |
|
| s |
suspension phase |
|
| w |
water |
|
REFERENCES
Adetayo, A. A., J. D. Litster, et al. (1995). Population
balance modelling of drum granulation of materials with wide
size distribution, Powder Technol., 82, 37-50.
Bramley, A. S., M. J. Hounslow, et al. (1996). Aggregation during precipitation
from solution: A method for extracting rates from experimental data, J. Colloid
Interface Sci., 183, 155-165.
Burgschweiger, J. (2000). Modellierung des statischen und dynamischen Verhaltens
von kontinuierlich betriebenen Wirbelschichttrocknern, Dissertation, Universität
Magdeburg.
Ding, A., C. A. Biggs, et al. (2006). Population balance model selection for
activated sludge flocculation modelling, Chem. Eng. Sci., 61, 63-74.
Groenewold, H. and E. Tsotsas (1997). A new model for fluid bed drying, Drying
Technol., 15, 1687-1698.
Hounslow, M. J., J. M. K. Pearson, et al. (2001). Tracer studies of high shear
granulation: II. Population balance modeling, AIChE J., 47, 1984-1999.
Hounslow, M. J., R. L. Ryall, et al. (1988). A discretized population balance
for nucleation, growth and aggregation, AIChE J., 38, 1821-1832.
Iveson, S. M. (2002). Limitations of one-dimensional population balance model
of wet granulation processes, Powder Technol., 124, 219-229.
Peglow, M. (2005). Beitrag zur Modellbildung eigenschaftsverteilter Feststoffsysteme
am Beispiel der Wirbelschicht-Sprühagglomeration, Dissertation, Universität
Magdeburg.
Peglow, M., J. Kumar, et al. (2006). A new technique to determine rate constants
for growth and agglomeration with size and time dependent nuclei formation,
Chem. Eng. Sci., 61, 282-292.
Peglow, M., J. Kumar, et al. (2006). Improved discretized tracer mass distribution
of Hounslow et al., AIChE J., 52, 1326-1332.
Saleh, M., M. Steinmetz, et al. (2003). Experimental study and modeling of
fluidized bed coating and agglomeration, Powder Technol., 130, 116-123.
Schaafsma, S. (2000). Down-scaling of a fluidised bed agglomeration process,
Dissertation, University of Groningen.
Tan, H. S., A. D. Salman, et al. (2004). Kinetics of fluidised bed melt granulation,
Part III: Tracer studies, Chem. Eng. Sci., 144, 65-83.
Watano, S., T. Fukushima, et al. (1996). Heat transfer and rate of granule
growth in fluidized bed granulation, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 44, 572-576.
 |
 |
 |
 |
Prof. Dr. Stefan
Heinrich did study process technology at the
University of Magdeburg from 1991-96, where he did
also obtain his Ph.D. in 2000, a junior professorship
in 2002 and where he still works as a scientific group
leader. In 2004 he was rewarded with the VDI ring of
honour.
Contact:
stefan.heinrich@vst.uni.magdeburg.de |
|